From our private database of 30,900+ case briefs...
Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System v. Southworth
United States Supreme Court
529 U.S. 217 (2000)
In 1996, Southworth, plaintiff, and two other law students at the University of Wisconsin brought suit against the Board of Regents (defendant) in federal district court challenging the constitutionality of the University’s mandatory student fee system. Southworth argued that it was unconstitutional for portions of their student fee to fund political or ideological activities with which they disagreed. Particularly, Southworth were concerned about the funding of multi-cultural groups, environmental groups, and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender groups. The district court granted summary judgment for Southworth. The court of appeals denied review, and the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Kennedy, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 553,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 553,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 30,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.