Body v. McDonald
Supreme Court of Wyoming
334 P.2d 513 (1959)
George and Lena Edwards conveyed a tract of land to the McDonalds (defendants), reserving a one-fourth interest in all oil in the land. Approximately two weeks later, the McDonalds conveyed the land to Albert Cheney and Charles Body (plaintiffs), with an almost identical reservation of a one-fourth interest in all oil in the land. The Bodys sued to quiet title in three-fourths of the mineral interest in the land. The Bodys claimed that the McDonalds had no interest in the land. The McDonalds asserted that, while one-fourth of the mineral interests belonged to the Edwardses, the McDonalds also owned one-fourth of the mineral interests. The trial court ruled in favor of the Bodys, finding that the McDonalds retained no interest in the property. The McDonalds appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Blume, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 177,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.