Logourl black

Boise Junior College District v. Mattefs Construction Co.

Idaho Supreme Court
450 P.2d 604 (1969)


Facts

Mattefs Construction Co. (Mattefs) (defendant) submitted a bid of $141,048 for a construction contract with Boise Junior College District (Boise). Boise expected to pay $150,000 for the construction project. Mattefs’ bid contained a customary bid bond involving a promise to pay the difference between its bid and the next higher bid actually accepted by Boise if Mattefs refused to contract with Boise for some reason. Unbeknownst to Mattefs at the time, its bid contained a clerical error which, if corrected, would have made Mattefs’ costs around $151,000 rather than $141,048. Boise ultimately awarded the contract to Mattefs, but Mattefs refused to sign the contract. Boise awarded the contract to the next higher bidder, Cain and Hardy, Inc., who bid $148, 915. Boise then brought suit against Mattefs in Idaho state court seeking to recover the difference in price between Mattefs’ bid and Cain and Hardy, Inc.’s bid. Mattefs sought the equitable remedy of rescission based on its clerical error. The trial court permitted rescission for Mattefs, and Boise appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Spear, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.