Bolsta v. Johnson
Vermont Supreme Court
848 A.2d 306 (2004)
- Written by Sharon Feldman, JD
Facts
Sarah Bolsta (plaintiff) was injured and her car totaled in a collision caused by Michael Johnson (defendant). Immediately after the accident, Johnson removed beer bottles from his car and smashed them on the road. Two hours after the collision, Johnson had a blood alcohol level of 0.156 and said he had drunk two beers and three shots in the hour before the collision. Johnson had a suspended license because of a prior conviction for driving under the influence and three convictions for driving with a suspended license. Johnson was charged with and pleaded no contest to driving under the influence and driving with a suspended license. Bolsta brought a personal-injury action against Johnson and his uninsured-motorist-insurance carrier, Concord General Mutual Insurance Co. (defendant). Johnson defaulted and was ordered to pay compensatory damages. The court denied Bolsta’s motion for punitive damages, finding that there was no evidence of malice. Bolsta appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Memorandum decision)
What to do next…
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
