Quimbee logo with url
From our private database of 14,900+ case briefs...

Bosley v. Andrews

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
142 A.2d 263 (1958)


Facts

Andrews’s (defendant) cattle strayed onto the farm of Mary Bosley (plaintiff). The cattle trampled Bosley’s crops. Additionally, a Hereford bull charged Bosley. The bull stopped approximately 25 feet away from Bosley, never touching or physically injuring her. Bosley was so frightened and shocked by the bull’s charge that she collapsed onto the ground and suffered a coronary insufficiency. Bosley’s coronary insufficiency led to having a heart disability. Bosley sued Andrews for negligence, seeking damages to compensate her for her heart disability. The trial court sustained the entry of a nonsuit based on Bosley’s failure to demonstrate her right to relief. Bosley appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bell, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 284,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,900 briefs, keyed to 201 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.