Botta v. Brunner
New Jersey Supreme Court
138 A.2d 713, 26 N.J. 82 (1958)
- Written by Serena Lipski, JD
Facts
Nancy Botta (plaintiff) was injured in a car accident caused by Herman G. Brunner (defendant) and Leo Frieband (defendant). Botta sued Brunner and Frieband for negligence, seeking among other things damages for pain and suffering. During closing arguments, Botta’s attorney asked the jury to place themselves in Botta’s position in considering how much pain-and-suffering damages to award her. Botta’s attorney further asked whether 50 cents per hour would be sufficient to compensate her for her pain and suffering. The trial court upheld an objection to both arguments. The jury awarded Botta $5,500 in damages, and Botta appealed, arguing that the trial court erred in refusing to allow her attorney’s closing arguments.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Francis, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.