Bowles Financial Group v. Stifel, Nicolaus & Co.
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
22 F.3d 1010 (1994)

- Written by Emily Pokora, JD
Facts
Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Inc. (Stifel) (defendant) disputed the amount it owed to Bowles Financial Group, Inc. (Bowles) (plaintiff). The parties arbitrated pursuant to agreement. During the arbitration, the attorney representing Bowles communicated Stifel’s prior settlement offer to the arbitrators multiple times. The attorney used the settlement offer to argue that Stifel admitted liability, did not pay, and was engaged in a plan to deceive Bowles. The arbitrators indicated that they would not consider the offer in rendering their decision. The arbitrators issued an award in favor of Bowles for more than the settlement offer. Stifel filed in district court, seeking to vacate the award. Stifel argued that introduction of the settlement offer was improper and that if settlement offers were allowed, no party would choose to settle knowing that an offer would be disclosed in arbitration. Bowles’s attorney argued that the arbitrators were not bound by the rules of evidence and that he owed his clients a duty to communicate the offer to the arbitrators. The district court found that the arbitration was fair and upheld the award. Stifel appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Brorby, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.