Boys Markets, Inc. v. Retail Clerks Union, Local 770
United States Supreme Court
398 U.S. 235 (1970)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
The collective-bargaining agreement (CBA) between the Retail Clerks Union, Local 770 (defendant), and Boys Markets, Inc. (plaintiff) prohibited strikes and required arbitration of all disputes. When the union called a strike and began picketing a Boys Market supermarket, the company demanded that the union end the strike and follow the arbitration process. When the strike continued the next day, the company filed a complaint in state court seeking injunctive relief and compliance with the arbitration provisions. The union promptly removed the case to federal court, which ordered the parties to arbitrate and enjoined the strike, picketing, and further attempts to induce work stoppages. The appellate court reversed under Sinclair Refining Co. v. Atkinson, 370 U.S. 195 (1962), which held that federal courts cannot enjoin strikes that violate no-strike provisions of a CBA. The Supreme Court granted review.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Brennan, J.)
Concurrence (Stewart, J.)
Dissent (White, J.)
Dissent (Black, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
