Braewood Convalescent Hospital v. Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board
California Supreme Court
666 P.2d 14 (1983)
- Written by Abby Roughton, JD
Facts
Braewood Convalescent Hospital (Braewood) (plaintiff) employed Eugene Bolton as a cook in California. On January 6, 1978, Bolton fell at work and injured his back and elbow. Bolton had been extremely overweight since childhood, and Bolton’s doctors suggested that losing weight would help Bolton recover from his injuries. However, the doctors did not recommend a specific weight-loss program, and Braewood did not offer to pay for a program. Bolton had previously experienced trouble losing weight, so he decided to enroll at a unique and highly regarded residential weight-loss clinic in North Carolina. Bolton participated in the clinic for about 10 months and lost a substantial amount of weight, but he began regaining weight when he returned to California. Bolton filed a workers’-compensation claim seeking reimbursement for his clinic expenses. Bolton also sought temporary disability compensation based on a doctor’s belief that Bolton could not work while participating in the clinic, and he sought payment for future weight-loss treatment based on doctors’ recommendations that continued weight loss would further help Bolton recover from the fall. A workers’-compensation judge awarded benefits, including reimbursement for clinic-related costs incurred by Bolton and expenses for Bolton’s future participation in the clinic. The Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) (defendant) affirmed the judge’s award for Bolton’s past and future treatment and also awarded temporary disability benefits for Bolton’s time at the clinic. Braewood asked the California Supreme Court to annul the WCAB’s decision.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Richardson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 790,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.