Brammer v. Derwinski

3 Vet. App. 223 (1992)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Brammer v. Derwinski

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
3 Vet. App. 223 (1992)

Facts

James Brammer (plaintiff) was a World War II combat veteran who claimed to have contracted spinal meningitis and suffered from frozen feet during his active service. In 1980, Brammer filed a claim for disability benefits with the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) (defendant) for the meningitis. The VA denied his claim, because there was no medical evidence to prove that Brammer had in fact been diagnosed with the disease during his active service, despite affidavits from fellow servicemen attesting to the fact that Brammer was treated for the disease at that time. The Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA) upheld the decision. Brammer attempted to reopen his claim in 1986 but was again denied. In 1988, Brammer again attempted to reopen his claim and additionally filed a claim for frozen feet. Brammer failed to assert in any of his filings that he suffered any current disability as a result of either of his alleged conditions. The VA again denied his 1988 petition for lack of evidence, and the BVA affirmed the denial. Brammer appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Holdaway, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership