From our private database of 14,200+ case briefs...
Brannan v. Northwest Permanente, P.C.
United States District Court of Western District of Washington
2006 WL 2794881
Mrs. Brannan’s primary care physician, Dr. Mike G. Lin, failed to order an evaluation of her cardiovascular condition and possible heart pathology. Brannan claims that health maintenance organizations (HMOs), like the one employing Lin, often provide financial incentives to physicians to discourage them from making referrals and ordering diagnostic tests. During Lin’s deposition, Brannan attempted to determine whether his employment contract with his HMO employer contained such an incentive provision. Lin testified that he did not know how his bonus was determined. Brannan (plaintiff) filed a motion to compel Lin’s HMO employer, Kaiser Permanente, P.C. (defendant) to provide Lin’s employment contract as well as any other documents relating to bonuses and how such bonuses were calculated. Kaiser Permanente, P.C. argued that it was irrelevant to examine the motives of Lin in a medical malpractice claim where the sole issue is whether he breached a medical standard of care resulting in injury to Brannan.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Burgess, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 240,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.