Brentwood at Hobart v. NLRB

675 F.3d 999 (2012)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Brentwood at Hobart v. NLRB

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
675 F.3d 999 (2012)

  • Written by Heather Whittemore, JD

Facts

Employees of Brentwood at Hobart (Brentwood) (plaintiff) decided to unionize through the Service Employees International Union (the union). To attempt to convince employees to support the union, the union handed out flyers and other literature. Flyers were handed out on August 14 and September 18, 2009. The employees voted to unionize, and Brentwood objected to the results. Specifically, Brentwood highlighted the September 18 flyer, which contained photographs of employees, and claimed the flyer may have conveyed a false impression that the photographed employees supported the union. The NLRB ordered a hearing on Brentwood’s objection. At the hearing, Brentwood attempted to introduce the August 14 flyer as well. The hearing officer excluded the August 14 flyer because it was not included in Brentwood’s objections. The hearing officer rejected Brentwood’s objections and certified the union. Brentwood then refused to bargain with the union, which the NLRB found to be an unfair labor practice. Brentwood appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Sutton, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership