Brigham City, Utah v. Stuart
United States Supreme Court
547 U.S. 398 (2006)
At 3:00 a.m. on July 23, 2000, police in Brigham City, Utah were called to a home for a loud party. The officers saw teens drinking alcohol in the backyard and a fight taking place inside the home. Several people were involved in the fight, and at least one person was injured. An officer opened the door and announced himself, but no one heard. The officer then entered the home and yelled, at which point the fight stopped. Stuart and other partygoers (defendants) were arrested on charges of disorderly conduct, intoxication, and contributing to the delinquency of a minor. The defendants argued that the officers’ entry into the home without a warrant violated the Fourth Amendment and moved to suppress evidence gathered after entry. The trial court granted the motion. The Utah Court of Appeals then affirmed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Roberts, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.