Broadway National Bank v. Adams
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
133 Mass. 170 (1882)
- Written by Dennis Chong, JD
Facts
Charles Adams (defendant) was the beneficiary of a trust created by his brother’s will. The will directed that $75,000 be deposited into a trust, with the funds to be invested and the income paid to Adams semiannually for life, then to his wife for life if she survived him. After both Adams and his wife died, the trust principle was to be divided equally among Adams’s children. The will expressly stated that the payments to Adams were to be free from interference or control by Adams’s creditors because the brother intended that Adams not be able to anticipatorily assign his interest in receipt of the income. When Adams became indebted to Broadway National Bank (Broadway) (plaintiff), Broadway filed suit against him, seeking an order requiring repayment of the debt from funds Adams was to receive under the trust. Adams argued that the trust provision prohibiting anticipatory assignment prevented the debt from attaching to trust funds before the funds were paid to him. Broadway countered that the restriction was inoperative because it was against common law for a trust settlor to be able to render a beneficiary’s absolute interest in trust funds inalienable.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Morton, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.