Brown v. School Board of Palm Beach County
Florida District Court of Appeal
855 So. 2d 1267 (2003)
- Written by Liz Nakamura, JD
Facts
The School Board of Palm Beach County (school board) (defendant) filed a breach-of-contract action against D’s and D’s Transport Equipment, Inc. (DDTE). DDTE was represented in the action by Michael Brown (plaintiff), and the school board was represented by Brett Horowitz. The school board noticed a deposition, but neither DDTE nor Brown appeared for the scheduled deposition. The school board then filed a motion for sanctions against Brown. At a hearing on the sanctions motion, both Brown and Horowitz presented unsworn testimony regarding what occurred on the day of the missed deposition. Neither Brown nor Horowitz objected to the introduction of the other’s unsworn testimony. Brown and Horowitz did not enter into a stipulation as to the facts. The trial court sanctioned Brown, basing its decision entirely on the unsworn testimony presented at the hearing. Brown appealed, arguing that, absent a stipulation as to the facts, a trial court could not base its factual findings on unsworn testimony.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
Concurrence (Gross, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.