Browning v. Poirier
Florida Supreme Court
165 So. 3d 663 (2015)

- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
In 1993, romantic partners Howard Browning (plaintiff) and Lynn Anne Poirier (defendant) orally agreed to begin buying lottery tickets and share the proceeds of any winning ticket. In 2007, Poirier won a million-dollar lottery prize. Poirier refused to share the money with Browning, who then sued Poirier for breach of contract. The trial court directed the jury’s verdict for Poirier, reasoning that the statute of frauds barred Browning’s claim. Browning appealed to an intermediate appellate court, which affirmed the trial court’s judgment. Browning appealed to the Florida Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Polston, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 966,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,007 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New
Understand your casebook readings in seconds
Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.
Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,007 law school casebooks.


