Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Brumm v. Bert Bell NFL Retirement Plan

United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
995 F.2d 1433 (1993)


Facts

Donald Brumm (plaintiff) was a professional football player in the National Football League (NFL) for nearly 10 years. During that time, Brumm suffered a number of injuries to his back and knees. Following his retirement from the NFL, Brumm worked as a truck driver. In 1977, Brumm suffered a back injury as a result of a highway accident while driving his truck. Brumm’s treating physician noted that Brumm had a pre-existing back condition from his football career called traumatic spondylolisthesis, a forward displacement of one vertebra over another. Thereafter, Brumm was unable to work at all due to his back pain, and he was awarded Social Security benefits. Brumm also applied for additional benefits from the Bert Bell NFL Retirement Plan (Bell Plan) (defendant). The plan provided two kinds of benefits to “totally and permanently disabled” former NFL players: (1) Level 1 Benefits of $4,000 per month if the disability was due to a football injury and (2) Level 2 Benefits paid if the total disability “resulted from other than a football injury.” Although the Bell Plan had determined that Brumm’s injury was at least partially connected to his time playing football, a Bell Plan arbitrator had ruled in a different case that Level 1 benefits were only to be distributed to a player who suffered the disability from one identifiable injury and became permanently disabled “within a reasonable time after leaving football.” All other cases warranted Level 2 benefits. Brumm filed suit challenging the ruling and the district court granted the Bell Plan’s motion to dismiss the suit. Brumm appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Arnold, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.