Brumm v. Bert Bell NFL Retirement Plan
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
995 F.2d 1433 (1993)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
Donald Brumm (plaintiff) was a professional football player in the National Football League (NFL) for nearly 10 years. During that time, Brumm suffered a number of injuries to his back and knees. Following his retirement from the NFL, Brumm worked as a truck driver. In 1977, Brumm suffered a back injury as a result of a highway accident while driving his truck. Brumm’s treating physician noted that Brumm had a pre-existing back condition from his football career called traumatic spondylolisthesis, a forward displacement of one vertebra over another. Thereafter, Brumm was unable to work at all due to his back pain, and he was awarded Social Security benefits. Brumm also applied for additional benefits from the Bert Bell NFL Retirement Plan (Bell Plan) (defendant). The plan provided two kinds of benefits to “totally and permanently disabled” former NFL players: (1) Level 1 Benefits of $4,000 per month if the disability was due to a football injury and (2) Level 2 Benefits paid if the total disability “resulted from other than a football injury.” Although the Bell Plan had determined that Brumm’s injury was at least partially connected to his time playing football, a Bell Plan arbitrator had ruled in a different case that Level 1 benefits were only to be distributed to a player who suffered the disability from one identifiable injury and became permanently disabled “within a reasonable time after leaving football.” All other cases warranted Level 2 benefits. Brumm filed suit challenging the ruling and the district court granted the Bell Plan’s motion to dismiss the suit. Brumm appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Arnold, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 796,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.