Bruton v. United States
United States Supreme Court
391 U.S. 123 (1968)
Facts
Bruton (defendant) and Evans were charged with committing armed postal robbery. Bruton and Evans had a joint trial. At trial, a postal inspector testified that Evans orally confessed to him that Evans and Bruton had committed the robbery. The confession was admitted into evidence against Evans, but the trial court instructed the jury that Evans’ confession was inadmissible hearsay against Bruton. Bruton and Evans were both convicted. The Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit set aside Evans’ conviction because of the admission of the hearsay confession. However, the Eighth Circuit affirmed Bruton’s conviction because the jury was instructed to disregard the confession with regard to Bruton’s guilt or innocence. The Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Brennan, J.)
Dissent (White, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 709,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
