Bryant v. Fox & Chicago Bears
Illinois Court of Appeals for the First District
515 N.E.2d 775 (1987)
Dr. Fox (defendant) was retained by the Chicago Bears (defendant) to serve as the team’s physician and to provide medical care to injured players. Fox was required to treat all injured players upon request during the season and off-season and to report the treatment to Bears’ management. Fox was paid an annual retainer of $12,000 for his work with the Bears, but maintained a very active medical practice in addition to his duties with the team. Waymond Bryant (plaintiff) and another Bears player brought a medical malpractice action against Fox and an action against the Bears under the theory of respondeat superior, based on the theory that Fox was an employee of the Bears. The trial court granted Fox and Bears’ motions to dismiss and Bryant appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Jignati, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.