Buchanan v. Vowell
Court of Appeals of Indiana
926 N.E.2d 515 (2010)
- Written by Lauren Petersen, JD
Facts
Candice and Shannon Vowell (defendants) were employed by Brad’s Gold Club (defendant). While at work or immediately after getting off work, Candice became intoxicated. Candice, together with her mother, Shannon, decided that although Candice was intoxicated, Candice would drive home with Shannon following close behind in her own car, calling Candice on her cell phone to give her directions as needed. The women drove home in tandem, and while conversing by cell phone, Candice struck Jerry Buchanan (plaintiff) as he walked at the edge of the road. Buchanan was thrown onto the hood of Candice’s car and into her windshield, which caused him to suffer fractured bones and brain damage. Buchanan sued the defendants for negligence. Shannon moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. The trial court granted her motion. Buchanan appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Barteau, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.