Budnick v. Town of Carefree
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
518 F.3d 1109 (2008)

- Written by Darius Dehghan, JD
Facts
F. G. Budnick (plaintiff) sought to develop a residential community for seniors in the Town of Carefree (the town) (defendant). The plans for the community did not comply with the applicable zoning ordinances, such that Budnick was required to obtain a special-use permit from the town. Budnick informed the town that the community would be restricted to healthy and active seniors who would be capable of independent living. After the town denied Budnick’s request for the permit, Budnick brought suit, contending that the town had violated the Fair Housing Act (FHA). Specifically, Budnick asserted that the town violated the FHA’s prohibition against disability discrimination because some residents of the community would, due to their age, become disabled after living in the community for awhile. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the town. Budnick appealed
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Smith, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.