Builders Federal (H.K.) Ltd v. Turner Construction
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
655 F. Supp. 1400 (1987)
- Written by Mary Katherine Cunningham, JD
Facts
Turner Construction and Turner International (defendants) owned Turner East Asia (TEA) (defendant), a Singaporean company serving as a main contractor for a major construction project in Singapore. Builders Federal (H.K.) Ltd. (Builders Federal) (plaintiff) was a Hong Kong corporation, serving as a subcontractor to TEA. TEA and Builders Federal had a subcontract agreement with an arbitration clause providing for arbitration in Singapore. The subcontract also provided that if a dispute arose between TEA and Builders Federal with the same character as a dispute between TEA and “the Employer under the Main Contract,” TEA and Builders Federal agreed to refer the dispute to arbitration “pursuant to the terms of the Main Contract.” Turner was not a party to the subcontract. Disputes arose during the construction project in Singapore, and TEA ceased work. Builders Federal initiated a suit in Singapore against TEA seeking to compel arbitration. TEA refused to arbitrate, arguing the dispute had to be heard pursuant to an arbitration clause in its main contract. Builders Federal filed a petition in United States District Court for the Southern District of New York to compel Turner and TEA to proceed with arbitration in Singapore. Builders Federal sought expedited discovery to assist in their petition. Builders Federal argued that Turner Construction and Turner International were liable for TEA’s obligation to arbitration because TEA was Turner’s alter ego. Turner Construction and Turner International asked for the district court to either dismiss the petition or to stay the lawsuit pending the completion of arbitration proceedings in Singapore.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Haight, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.