Burgess v. Taylor

44 S.W.3d 806 (2001)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Burgess v. Taylor

Kentucky Court of Appeals
44 S.W.3d 806 (2001)

  • Written by Haley Gintis, JD

Facts

In August 1994, Judy Taylor (plaintiff) entered into a free-lease agreement with Lisa and Jeff Burgess (defendants) that allowed Taylor to keep her horses on the Burgesses’ farm. Prior to relinquishing custody of the horses, Taylor told the Burgesses that she expected to visit the horses often and that she retained ownership of the horses. However, after the Burgesses gained possession of the horses, Lisa sold the horses to a slaughter-buyer for $1,000. A week later, Taylor informed the Burgesses that she planned to visit the farm to see her horses. Lisa told Taylor that the horses were no longer at the farm because a friend of the Burgesses had taken the horses. Taylor contacted the friend that Lisa had mentioned but received no information about the horses’ whereabouts. Taylor began working with a humane investigator to locate the horses. The investigator discovered that the horses had been slaughtered. Taylor filed an action against the Burgesses for breach of contract and for the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress. Taylor testified in front of a jury that she experienced panic attacks, general anxiety, depression, suicidal thoughts, high blood pressure, and difficulty sleeping after discovering the horses had been slaughtered. The jury found the Burgesses guilty of the contract breach and of intentional infliction of emotional distress. The jury awarded Taylor $50,000 in compensatory damages and $75,000 in punitive damages. The Burgesses appealed on the ground that Kentucky law prohibited emotional damages due to the loss of an animal. The Burgesses also claimed that the amount the jury had awarded Taylor was excessive. The Kentucky Court of Appeals reviewed the case.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Schroder, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 806,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership