Burns v. State
Supreme Court of Wisconsin
128 N.W. 987 (1911)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
Burns (defendant), a constable, and others were pursuing an insane man named Adamsky. During the pursuit, Adamsky dropped money which was later given to Burns by a fellow officer. Burns subsequently misappropriated the money and was charged with larceny. At trial, the judge instructed the jury that Burns was the “bailee” of Adamsky’s money and the jury convicted Burns of larceny by bailee under Wisconsin law. Burns appealed, arguing that that the trial court should have defined the term “bailee” as used in the statute.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Marshall, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.