Bush v. Palm Beach County Canvassing Board

531 U.S. 70 (2000)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Bush v. Palm Beach County Canvassing Board

United States Supreme Court
531 U.S. 70 (2000)

JL
Play video

Facts

The Florida Division of Elections announced on the day after the 2000 presidential election that George W. Bush had won Florida’s electoral votes. Bush had received only 1,784 more votes than Al Gore. This margin triggered an automatic machine recount under Florida law. After the machine recount, the margin further narrowed. Gore requested manual recounts in four counties. However, Florida law required counties to submit their election returns to the Florida Department of State no later than seven days after the election. The four counties requested an extension of the deadline in order to complete the manual recounts. The Florida secretary of state directed the counties to submit a written statement explaining the need for an extension. The counties did so, and the secretary denied the request. The Florida Supreme Court invoked its equitable powers under the Florida Constitution and ruled that the deadline was extended by 12 days.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 825,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 990 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 990 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership