Butera v. District of Columbia

235 F.3d 637 (2001)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 37,500+ case briefs...

Butera v. District of Columbia

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

235 F.3d 637 (2001)

Facts

Eric Butera (plaintiff) was a former drug user who came forward to the Metropolitan Police Department (the city) (defendant) with information regarding a high-profile homicide. He gained such information by overhearing conversations at his drug dealer’s house. Butera agreed to act as a police informant and stage a drug deal so that police could pull off an undercover operation. One detective dropped Butera off at the back door of the dealer’s house and drove around to the front where Butera was to exit. Two other officers waited from a position where they also could not see Butera. Butera never made it inside the house as he was attacked and beaten to death by three men in the alley behind the house. His family brought a survival action against the city under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 as well as a wrongful-death action.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Rogers, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 631,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 631,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 37,500 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 631,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 37,500 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership