C. Czarnikow, Ltd. v. Koufos
House of Lords
2 Lloyd’s Rep. 457 (1967)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
Koufos (plaintiff) chartered a container shipping vessel owned by C. Czarnikow, Ltd. (Czarnikow) (defendant) to load a cargo of 3,000 tons of sugar for delivery to the Port of Basra and then promptly sold to merchants. The voyage took nine days longer than expected. By the time the vessel reached Basra the market price of sugar had dropped due to the arrival of another cargo of sugar. Although Czarnikow knew there was a sugar market in Basra it was not aware that Koufos intended to immediately sell the sugar upon the vessel’s arrival there. Consequently, instead of receiving £32 10s per ton for the sugar, Koufos was paid £31 2s per ton. Koufos filed suit against Czarnikow for breach of contract and sought the difference between the market price and the price he received for the sugar as damages. The trial court held in favor of Czarnikow. Koufos appealed. The court of appeal reversed and held that Koufos’ loss due to the fall in market price was not too remote to be recoverable as damages. Czarnikow appealed to the House of Lords.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Reid, L.)
Concurrence (Morris, L.)
Concurrence (Upjohn, L.)
Concurrence (Pearce, L.)
What to do next…
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.