From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.
Cadle Co. v. Errato
Connecticut Appellate Court
71 Conn.App. 447, 802 A.2d 887 (2002)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
Cadle Company (Cadle) (plaintiff) sued Robert Errato (defendant) to collect on a promissory note that Errato had executed as security for a bank loan and on which Errato subsequently defaulted. Cadle’s trial evidence included (1) a bank officer’s testimony that the bank had sold and assigned its rights in the note to Cadle, (2) a Cadle manager’s testimony that Cadle held the original note at its out-of-state headquarters, (3) a copy of the sale-and-assignment agreement, and (4) a copy of the original note. The trial court entered judgment for Cadle. Errato appealed to the Connecticut Appellate Court, citing Cadle’s failure to produce the actual note.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Dranginis, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
