Supreme Court of Washington
396 P.2d 148 (Wash. 1964)
Mrs. Henderson was the executrix of her husband’s will. Henderson hired Harry Calbom (plaintiff) as her attorney to handle the probate proceedings. Henderson also consulted Halvor Knudtzon (defendant), a certified public accountant, to handle tax issues related to her husband’s estate. At a consultation meeting, Knudtzon asked Henderson if she had hired an attorney for the probate proceedings. Henderson stated that she had hired Calbom, in response to which Knudtzon shook his head, indicating that Calbom was a poor choice. Knudtzon then recommended other attorneys to Henderson, one of whom Henderson ultimately hired to replace Calbom. Calbom brought suit against Knudtzon for intentional interference with Calbom’s employment contract with Henderson. The trial court found in favor of Calbom, and Knudtzon appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Hamilton, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.