Caldwell v. A.R.B., Inc.
Court of Appeal of California
222 Cal. Rptr. 494 (1986)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Bruce Brandon (defendant) worked as a pipefitter for A.R.B., Inc. (A.R.B.) (defendant). Brandon was working on a site to which there was no public transportation, requiring him to drive. Because the employees were required to drive to the site, A.R.B. paid them a daily travel allowance to compensate for using their personal cars. One day, Brandon offered to drive a coworker, Richardson, home after work. On the way home, Brandon got into a car accident with Caldwell (plaintiff), causing Caldwell injuries. Caldwell brought suit against A.R.B. and Brandon. A.R.B. filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that Brandon was not acting within the scope of his employment at the time of the accident. The trial court granted the motion. Caldwell appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.