California v. Acevedo
United States Supreme Court
500 U.S. 565, 111 S. Ct. 1982, 114 L. Ed. 2d 619 (1991)
- Written by Sarah Venti, JD
Facts
The police watched as a man entered his home carrying a package they had probable cause to believe contained marijuana. Before a search warrant could be obtained, Acevedo (defendant) arrived at the house and left after about 10 minutes carrying a bag that was the same size as the package. Acevedo put the bag in the trunk of his car and drove away. Fearful of losing the evidence, the police followed him, pulled him over, opened the trunk, and looked inside the bag, finding marijuana. The California Court of Appeal held that the marijuana found in the bag should have been suppressed at trial because the police needed a warrant to search the bag. The court of appeals also found that the bag did not fall under the automobile exception, because the police had probable cause to believe that the bag, not the car, contained drugs. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Blackmun, J.)
Concurrence (Scalia, J.)
Dissent (Stevens, J.)
Dissent (White, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 990 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
