California v. Comcast Cable Communications Management

Case No. 15786197 (2015)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

California v. Comcast Cable Communications Management

California Superior Court
Case No. 15786197 (2015)

Facts

Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC (Comcast) (defendant) provided telephone services via the Internet. Comcast charged a monthly fee to keep a subscriber’s telephone number unlisted and private. Comcast sold all other numbers to a listing service that listed a subscriber’s name and phone number in an online directory. However, at one point, an internal Comcast error caused Comcast to sell all its phone numbers to the listing service, including around 75,000 phone numbers that subscribers had paid to keep unlisted. Comcast received complaints about the unlisted numbers being made public for one and a half years before it determined what had happened and had the private numbers pulled from the online listing. Comcast offered to refund the monthly fees to customers who had been affected. Approximately 200 people complained that they had needed their numbers unlisted for safety reasons. The California attorney general (plaintiff) sued Comcast, alleging violations of California’s false-advertising, unfair-competition, and public-utilities laws. The parties reached a proposed settlement in which Comcast agreed to (1) pay each affected subscriber $100 for a total of approximately $7.5 million, (2) pay an extra $432,000 to the subscribers who had safety issues, (3) pay $25 million to the state in penalties, and (4) be subject to an ongoing injunction order from the court. The injunction order required Comcast to take actions such as continuing to try to fix the existing disclosure, protecting the allowed listing information to ensure that the information was used properly by third parties, responding to complaints sooner and more thoroughly, and otherwise taking measures to avoid any future disclosures of private consumer data. The parties submitted this proposed settlement to the court for approval.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Grillo, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 806,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership