California v. Mentch
California Supreme Court
195 P.3d 1061, 45 Cal. 4th, 85 Cal. Rptr. 3d 480 (2008)
- Written by Patrick Speice, JD
Facts
Roger Mentch (defendant) was an authorized medical-marijuana user who grew marijuana to consume and sell to other authorized medical-marijuana users through Mentch’s medical-marijuana distribution and consulting business. Mentch advised his customers on consumption of marijuana to treat the customers’ illnesses and occasionally transported customers to doctor’s appointments. When Mentch grew more marijuana than was needed for treatment purposes, Mentch gave the excess marijuana to marijuana clubs. Mentch was arrested and charged with manufacture of a controlled substance and possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance after police officers searched Mentch’s home and found nearly 200 marijuana plants. Two of Mentch’s patients, Laura Eldridge and Leland Besson, testified at Mentch’s trial. Eldridge and Besson had purchased marijuana from Mentch regularly and exclusively during the prior year, and Eldridge had recently entered into a relationship with Mentch and stayed at Mentch’s house on at least one occasion. Based on these facts, Mentch argued for an acquittal under a provision in California’s medical-marijuana law that immunized authorized medical-marijuana patients’ designated primary caregivers against conviction for possessing or cultivating marijuana to treat the caregivers’ patients. The trial court refused to instruct the jury on the caregiver defense raised by Mentch and denied Mentch’s motion for acquittal. Mentch was convicted and appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Werdegar, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.