California v. Mentch

195 P.3d 1061, 45 Cal. 4th, 85 Cal. Rptr. 3d 480 (2008)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

California v. Mentch

California Supreme Court
195 P.3d 1061, 45 Cal. 4th, 85 Cal. Rptr. 3d 480 (2008)

  • Written by Patrick Speice, JD

Facts

Roger Mentch (defendant) was an authorized medical-marijuana user who grew marijuana to consume and sell to other authorized medical-marijuana users through Mentch’s medical-marijuana distribution and consulting business. Mentch advised his customers on consumption of marijuana to treat the customers’ illnesses and occasionally transported customers to doctor’s appointments. When Mentch grew more marijuana than was needed for treatment purposes, Mentch gave the excess marijuana to marijuana clubs. Mentch was arrested and charged with manufacture of a controlled substance and possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance after police officers searched Mentch’s home and found nearly 200 marijuana plants. Two of Mentch’s patients, Laura Eldridge and Leland Besson, testified at Mentch’s trial. Eldridge and Besson had purchased marijuana from Mentch regularly and exclusively during the prior year, and Eldridge had recently entered into a relationship with Mentch and stayed at Mentch’s house on at least one occasion. Based on these facts, Mentch argued for an acquittal under a provision in California’s medical-marijuana law that immunized authorized medical-marijuana patients’ designated primary caregivers against conviction for possessing or cultivating marijuana to treat the caregivers’ patients. The trial court refused to instruct the jury on the caregiver defense raised by Mentch and denied Mentch’s motion for acquittal. Mentch was convicted and appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Werdegar, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 810,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership