Camacho v. Major League Baseball
United States District Court for the Southern District of California
297 F.R.D. 457 (2013)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Daniel Pesqueira (plaintiff) played baseball for the Red Devils, a team in the Mexican League. The Boston Red Sox invited Pesqueira to try out but sent him back to Mexico at the direction of Major League Baseball (MLB) (defendant). MLB told the Red Sox that Pesqueira could not play for the Red Sox without the Red Devils’ consent. Pesqueira and his agent, David Camacho (plaintiff), sued MLB on a number of grounds, alleging that MLB conspired with the Mexican League to Pesqueira’s detriment. Pesqueira claimed that his contracts with the Red Devils and the Mexican League were invalid. MLB filed a motion to dismiss for Pesqueira’s failure to join the Red Devils and the Mexican League as parties under Rule 19 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lorenz, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.