From our private database of 12,700+ case briefs...
Cambria v. Jeffery
Supreme Court of Massachusetts
29 N.E.2d 555 (1940)
Jeffery (defendant) sustained injuries in an automobile accident involving Cambria’s (plaintiff) servant. In a prior action, Jeffery sued Cambria in a district court to recover for his injuries and damage to his automobile, alleging that the accident was caused by Cambria’s servant’s negligence. However, in that case, both parties were found to have been negligent. As a result, judgment was entered in favor of Cambria. Thereafter, Cambria brought this action against Jeffery for negligence, seeking recovery for the damage to his automobile from the accident. At trial, the jury returned a verdict in favor of Cambria, but the judge entered a verdict for Jeffery on the grounds that the prior judgment had adjudicated that Cambria had also been negligent. Cambria appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Lummus, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 120,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 12,700 briefs, keyed to 172 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.