Campbell v. Murdock
United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
90 F.Supp. 297 (1950)
- Written by John Waller, JD
Facts
Campbell (plaintiff) expended considerable labor and materials to improve Murdock’s (defendant) land pursuant to a contract that required Murdock to pay Campbell for the improvements. Campbell did not receive payment, and brought this foreclosure action in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio to enforce a lien on the land and seeking a personal judgment against Murdock for the debt. The court’s jurisdiction was based on diversity of citizenship and the provisions of 28 U.S.C.A. § 1655, which authorizes in rem jurisdiction over land located within the court’s district. Murdock made a special appearance to challenge the court’s jurisdiction and moved to dismiss the action because the district court lacked the authority to make a personal judgment against her. Murdock also appeared to defend her interest in the property and moved for a more definite statement of the complaint.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Jones, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.