Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Campbell v. Seaman

63 N.Y. 568 (1876)

Case BriefQ&ARelatedOptions
From our private database of 22,600+ case briefs...

Campbell v. Seaman

Court of Appeals of New York

63 N.Y. 568 (1876)

Play video

Facts

Landowners (plaintiffs) bought 40 acres of land in 1849 and invested a large sum of money on improvements, including a mansion, ornamental trees, flowers, and vines. The landowners’ neighbor (defendant) owned a brickyard that was not in operation at the time of the landowners’ purchase. The landowners were aware of the brickyard at the time of their purchase, but were unaware that the neighbor intended to burn bricks. The neighbor burned bricks from 1853 to 1857, used his land for agricultural purposes from 1857 to 1867, and burned bricks again in 1867. The burning released sulfuric acid gas that killed the landowners’ plants and trees. The gas did not enter the landowners’ property continuously, but only when the wind carried the gas onto the property. The landowners objected to the brick burning and then sought an injunction and damages. The court granted the injunction and damages. On appeal, the neighbor objected to the injunction on the grounds that damages were an adequate remedy, the landowners had acquiesced to the nuisance, and the neighbor had acquired a prescriptive right to burn bricks.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Earl, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 519,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 519,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions and answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 519,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 22,600 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership