Canal Barge Co., Inc. v. China Ocean Shipping Co.
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
770 F.2d 1357, 1986 AMC 2042 (1985)
- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
The Elaine Jones was a towboat pulling barges southbound on the Mississippi River close to a point of land that jutted out into the river. The motor vessel Huatonghai was traveling northward on the river on the other side of the point. There was a custom of navigation on the Mississippi River, called the point-bend custom, under which northbound vessels would navigate close to points of land sticking out into the river and southbound vessels would navigate close to the bend in the river opposite points. Vessels could choose to follow different navigational procedures by agreement, however. The Elaine Jones agreed to pass the Huatonghai starboard-to-starboard, at the Huatonghai’s request, because of Huatonghai’s location in the river after it passed another towboat with barges. Passing the Huatonghai in this way required the Elaine Jones to move into the swiftest part of the current. The vessels passed each other safely, but the Elaine Jones could not control its barges in the current, and the barges then collided with a wharf and two moored vessels. The owner of the Elaine Jones, Canal Barge Co., Inc. (plaintiff) sued the owner of the Huatonghai, China Ocean Shipping Co. (defendant). The district court held that the Elaine Jones was one-third at fault and the Huatonghai was two-thirds at fault. China Ocean Shipping appealed, alleging that the court erred in not assessing a greater degree of liability to the Elaine Jones because the starboard-to-starboard pass was in accordance with the point-bend custom.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Rubin, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.