Canal Co. v. Clark
United States Supreme Court
80 U.S. 311 (1872)
- Written by Steven Pacht, JD
Facts
Canal Company (Canal) (plaintiff) was one of the first coal producers from Pennsylvania’s Lackawanna Valley. Canal marketed and sold its coal under the name Lackawanna coal, which it claimed as a trademark. However, all coal taken from the Lackawanna Valley, whether or not it was mined or sold by Canal, has long been known as Lackawanna coal, and all coal from the Lackawanna Valley is of the same quality and has the same general appearance. Canal sued Clark (defendant) seeking to preclude him from using Lackawanna Valley to describe his coal, which he did not obtain from Canal. The circuit court dismissed Canal’s complaint. Canal appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Strong, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.