Cannella v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.
Florida Supreme Court
801 So. 2d 94 (2001)
- Written by Liz Nakamura, JD
Facts
Jeffrey and Joanne Cannella (plaintiffs) filed a personal-injury action against Mock Plumbing Contractor, Inc. (MPC), a dissolved-corporation, for injuries incurred prior to MPC’s dissolution. At the relevant time, MPC had a commercial general-liability insurance policy through Auto-Owners Insurance Company (Auto-Owners) (defendant). In June 1992, the Cannellas effected service-of-process on MPC via personal-service on Monica Mock, who was listed in Florida’s corporate records as both MPC’s president and registered-agent. Mock was the only individual ever recorded as having any connection to MPC. The Cannellas’ affidavit-of-service stated that Mock was served in her capacity as MPC’s registered-agent. After trial, judgment was entered in favor of the Cannellas, and MPC assigned its rights under the Auto-Owners policy to the Cannellas. After Auto-Owners refused to pay-out the judgment entered against MPC, the Cannellas sued Auto-Owners for breach-of-contract. In response, Auto-Owners moved to set-aside the judgment entered against MPC, arguing that the judgment was void because (1) service-of-process on MPC, as a dissolved-corporation, could only be effectuated via service-of-process on MPC’s director-as-trustee; and (2) because Mock was not MPC’s director-as-trustee, and instead was served in her capacity as MPC’s registered-agent, personal-service on Mock did not constitute valid service-of-process on MPC. The trial court rejected Auto-Owners’ challenge and awarded damages to the Cannellas. On appeal, the appellate court reversed, holding that the judgment entered against MPC was void because service-of-process on Mock did not constitute valid service-of-process on MPC. The Cannellas appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.