Cannella v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.
Florida Supreme Court
801 So. 2d 94 (2001)
- Written by Liz Nakamura, JD
Facts
Jeffrey and Joanne Cannella (plaintiffs) filed a personal-injury action against Mock Plumbing Contractor, Inc. (MPC), a dissolved-corporation, for injuries incurred prior to MPC’s dissolution. At the relevant time, MPC had a commercial general-liability insurance policy through Auto-Owners Insurance Company (Auto-Owners) (defendant). In June 1992, the Cannellas effected service-of-process on MPC via personal-service on Monica Mock, who was listed in Florida’s corporate records as both MPC’s president and registered-agent. Mock was the only individual ever recorded as having any connection to MPC. The Cannellas’ affidavit-of-service stated that Mock was served in her capacity as MPC’s registered-agent. After trial, judgment was entered in favor of the Cannellas, and MPC assigned its rights under the Auto-Owners policy to the Cannellas. After Auto-Owners refused to pay-out the judgment entered against MPC, the Cannellas sued Auto-Owners for breach-of-contract. In response, Auto-Owners moved to set-aside the judgment entered against MPC, arguing that the judgment was void because (1) service-of-process on MPC, as a dissolved-corporation, could only be effectuated via service-of-process on MPC’s director-as-trustee; and (2) because Mock was not MPC’s director-as-trustee, and instead was served in her capacity as MPC’s registered-agent, personal-service on Mock did not constitute valid service-of-process on MPC. The trial court rejected Auto-Owners’ challenge and awarded damages to the Cannellas. On appeal, the appellate court reversed, holding that the judgment entered against MPC was void because service-of-process on Mock did not constitute valid service-of-process on MPC. The Cannellas appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 966,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,007 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New
Understand your casebook readings in seconds
Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.
Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,007 law school casebooks.


