Canterbury v. Spence
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
464 F.2d 772 (1972)
- Written by Megan Petersen, JD
Facts
At the age of 19, Canterbury (plaintiff) experienced severe upper-back pain. Dr. Spence (defendant), a neurosurgeon recommended that Canterbury undergo a laminectomy, an operation to repair a suspected ruptured disc. Canterbury did not object or ask any questions about the procedure. On the phone, Spence told Canterbury’s mother that she did not need to come to the hospital and that the operation was no more serious “than any other operation.” Canterbury’s mother signed a consent form after the procedure was performed. The day after the operation, Canterbury fell from his hospital bed and became paralyzed from the waist down, requiring additional surgery. Even after the second operation, Canterbury suffered long-term incontinence and bladder paralysis. Canterbury sued Spence and the hospital (defendant), arguing that Spence had committed medical malpractice by failing to disclose that paralysis was a risk of the original surgery. Spence and the hospital moved for directed verdicts. The court granted the verdicts on the grounds that Canterbury had failed to produce any medical evidence of negligence. Canterbury appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Robinson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 922,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,300 briefs, keyed to 1,000 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.


