Canterbury v. Spence

464 F.2d 772 (1972)

From our private database of 47,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Canterbury v. Spence

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
464 F.2d 772 (1972)

Play video

Facts

At the age of 19, Canterbury (plaintiff) experienced severe upper-back pain. Dr. Spence (defendant), a neurosurgeon recommended that Canterbury undergo a laminectomy, an operation to repair a suspected ruptured disc. Canterbury did not object or ask any questions about the procedure. On the phone, Spence told Canterbury’s mother that she did not need to come to the hospital and that the operation was no more serious “than any other operation.” Canterbury’s mother signed a consent form after the procedure was performed. The day after the operation, Canterbury fell from his hospital bed and became paralyzed from the waist down, requiring additional surgery. Even after the second operation, Canterbury suffered long-term incontinence and bladder paralysis. Canterbury sued Spence and the hospital (defendant), arguing that Spence had committed medical malpractice by failing to disclose that paralysis was a risk of the original surgery. Spence and the hospital moved for directed verdicts. The court granted the verdicts on the grounds that Canterbury had failed to produce any medical evidence of negligence. Canterbury appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Robinson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 922,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 922,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,300 briefs, keyed to 1,000 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 922,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,300 briefs - keyed to 1,000 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Understand your casebook readings in seconds

Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.

Get instant access to over 47,300+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,000 law school casebooks.

Case book preview