Carbasho v. Musulin
West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals
618 S.E.2d 368 (2005)
- Written by Anjali Bhat, JD
Facts
Helen Tracy Carbasho (plaintiff) and her dog were struck by a vehicle driven by Michael Musulin (defendant). Carbasho and the dog were both injured, and the dog died from the injuries. Carbasho sued for her personal injuries and the death of her dog. Carbasho and Musulin agreed to a settlement with respect to Carbasho’s bodily-injury claims, leaving the dog’s death as the only issue remaining to be determined. Carbasho argued that the damages for the death of the dog should include sentimental value, emotional distress, and emotional attachment. Musulin moved for summary judgment, arguing that the dog was personal property and that West Virginia law limited the damages for the loss of personal property to its fair market value. The trial court granted Musulin’s motion for summary judgment. Carbasho appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Maynard, J.)
Dissent (Starcher, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.