Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia
618 S.E.2d 368 (2005)
Helen Tracy Carbasho (plaintiff) and her dog were struck by a vehicle driven by Michael Musulin (defendant). Carbasho and the dog were both injured, and the dog died from the injuries. Carbasho sued for her personal injuries and the death of her dog. Carbasho and Musulin agreed to a settlement with respect to Carbasho’s bodily-injury claims, leaving the dog’s death as the only issue remaining to be determined. Carbasho argued that the damages for the death of the dog should include sentimental value, emotional distress, and emotional attachment. Musulin moved for summary judgment, arguing that the dog was personal property and that West Virginia law limited the damages for the loss of personal property to its fair market value. The trial court granted Musulin’s motion for summary judgment. Carbasho appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Maynard, J.)
Dissent (Starcher, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.