Carstarphen v. Milsner
United States District Court for the District of Nevada
693 F. Supp. 2d 1247 (2010)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
Minority shareholder John Carstarphen (plaintiff) brought a diversity action alleging majority shareholder Richard Milsner (defendant) illegally siphoned away profits from Delaware corporation American Medflight, Inc. Carstarphen, Milsner, and John Dawson had founded American Medflight as equal co-owners, but Milsner acquired beneficial ownership of nearly all Dawson’s shares. Milsner argued Delaware precedent required Carstarphen to bring a derivative action on the company’s behalf, rather than a direct action, unless he showed injury independent from injury to the corporation. But if the company recovered in a derivative action, Milsner would control that recovery and again siphon the money away. Milsner moved to dismiss for failure to join American Medflight as an indispensable party. Meanwhile, the company continued generating revenues as a going concern.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Reed, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
