Cartel Capital Corporation. v. Fireco of New Jersey
New Jersey Supreme Court
410 A.2d 674 (1980)
- Written by Dan Lake, JD
Facts
Country Burger (plaintiff) operated a business that contained a fire extinguishing system manufactured by Ansul (defendant). Fireco (defendant) was responsible for distributing and servicing the system. A grease buildup started a fire, and the fire extinguishing system failed, causing significant damage to Country Burger’s restaurant. Country Burger brought a negligence claim against Fireco and a strict liability claim against Ansul for the fire damage. The jury found $113,400 in damages and allocated 41 percent of the fault to Country Burger, 29 percent to Fireco, and 30 percent to Ansul. Before the jury announced its verdict, however, Ansul had settled with Country Burger for $50,000. The trial court then dismissed Fireco’s cross claim for contribution against Ansul.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Schreiber, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.