Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

CBS, Inc. v. Merrick

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
716 F.2d 1292 (1983)


Facts

CBS, Inc. (plaintiff) agreed to purchase the television rights to the novel Blood and Money from David Merrick (defendant). Under the contract, if photography on the television series had not started by August 1, 1979, the rights to the novel would revert to Merrick. CBS paid $916,666 to Merrick and his agents. Pursuant to the agreement, Merrick hired a director and screenwriter for the project, and CBS paid them $750,000. Merrick knew that the director and screenwriter could not begin work on the project right away, but failed to tell them of the August 1 deadline or hire additional screenwriters. Photography was unable to start by the August 1 deadline, because the screenplay was not finished. CBS brought an action for rescission and restitution. The trial court found that Merrick had refused to perform and breached the contract with CBS. The court awarded restitution damages of the $916,666 CBS paid to Merrick and his agent, but refused to award CBS the $750,000 it paid the director and screenwriter as reliance damages.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Solomon, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Concurrence (Nelson, J.)

The concurrence section is for members only and includes a summary of the concurring judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 173,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.