CDI Energy Services, Inc. v. West River Pumps, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
567 F.3d 398 (2009)
- Written by Tammy Boggs, JD
Facts
CDI Energy Services, Inc. (CDI) (plaintiff) sold and serviced equipment that was used in the oilfield industry. In 2000, CDI hired John Martinson and Dale Roller (defendants) to open a CDI field office in Dickinson, North Dakota. Martinson and Roller had been working for a competitor of CDI, were experienced in the industry, and had client contacts in the locale. Roller brought a significant client with him to CDI. In 2007, Martinson hired Kent Heinle (defendant) to work as a service technician for CDI. Thereafter, while still employed for CDI, the three employees formed West River Pumps, Inc. (West River) (defendant) and asked CDI’s clients to do business with West River. Other than Martinson, Roller, and Heinle, the Dickinson office of CDI had no other employees. In October 2007, the three men resigned from CDI, leaving CDI with no presence in the local market. CDI sued West River, Martinson, Roller, and Heinle, alleging state-law claims of trade-secret misappropriation and breach of loyalty. CDI claimed that the company’s trade-secret customer information was misappropriated, while the three former employees countered that the information was openly available, they took few records with them when they left CDI, and no substantial efforts were made to keep the customer information confidential. The district court granted an ex parte temporary restraining order in CDI’s favor. However, following a hearing, the court denied CDI’s motion for preliminary injunction despite finding that CDI was likely to prevail on its breach-of-loyalty claim. CDI appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Melloy, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.