Cedar Lane Ranch, Inc. v. Lundberg

991 P.2d 440 (1999)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Cedar Lane Ranch, Inc. v. Lundberg

Montana Supreme Court
991 P.2d 440 (1999)

Facts

In 1902, Albert Tinklepaugh conveyed land west of a county road, now a highway, to James McGowan, a predecessor in interest to Cedar Lane Ranch, Inc. (Cedar Lane Ranch) (plaintiff). In 1916, Tinklepaugh conveyed land east of this road to Carl Nelson (defendant), who deeded his land to the Carl Nelson Ranch Company (Carl Nelson Ranch) (defendant) in 1964. For a while, both Cedar Lane Ranch and Carl Nelson Ranch believed that more than seven acres of property west of the highway was owned by Cedar Lane Ranch. However, a right-of-way survey performed by Montana in 1994 revealed that more than seven acres of property west of the highway was owned by Cedar Lane Ranch. Based on this new information, Cedar Lane Ranch brought an action in the district court to quiet title to the disputed property, and Carl Nelson Ranch filed a counterclaim. The state district court granted summary judgment in favor of Cedar Lane Ranch both on its complaint and on Carl Nelson Ranch’s counterclaim, and Carl Nelson Ranch appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hunt, J.)

Dissent (Trieweiler, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 807,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership