Cefaratti v. Aranow
Connecticut Supreme Court
141 A.3d 752, 321 Conn. 593 (2016)
Jonathan Aranow conducted gastric bypass surgery on Lisa Cefaratti (plaintiff) at Middlesex Hospital (defendant). Cefaratti chose Aranow after researching potential surgeons and determining that Aranow was the best in the state. Also, Aranow had successfully performed the surgery on Cefaratti’s partner’s mother. Aranow left a surgical sponge in Cefaratti’s stomach during the surgery. Cefaratti sued Middlesex on the ground that it was vicariously liable for Aranow’s tort. The trial court granted Middlesex summary judgment on the ground that the State of Connecticut did not recognize the doctrine of apparent authority in tort actions. The court of appeals affirmed. The Connecticut Supreme Court granted Cefaratti’s petition for certification to appeal.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Rogers, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.