Central Laborers Pension Fund v. News Corp.

45 A.3d 139 (2012)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Central Laborers Pension Fund v. News Corp.

Delaware Supreme Court
45 A.3d 139 (2012)

Facts

Pursuant to § 220 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, the Central Laborers Pension Fund (fund) (plaintiff) made a demand to the News Corporation (corporation) (defendant) to inspect the corporation’s books and records to investigate potential breaches of fiduciary duties by the corporation’s directors. However, the fund’s inspection demand contained several errors, including naming the wrong corporation, inconsistently claiming to be both the record owner of corporation shares and the beneficial owner of the same shares, and failing to annex sworn proof of its beneficial ownership of the corporation’s shares. The fund subsequently filed suit in Delaware Chancery Court, seeking an order compelling the corporation to produce the requested books and records. The fund provided sworn evidence of its beneficial ownership of corporation stock in the course of the § 220 litigation. The corporation moved to dismiss the complaint, arguing, among other things, that the fund’s inspection demand did not comply with § 220’s requirements. The vice chancellor agreed and dismissed the complaint. The fund appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Holland, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership