Central New York Basketball, Inc. (Syracuse Nationals) v. Barnett
Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Cuyahoga County
181 N.E.2d 506 (1961)
Dick Barnett (defendant) was a first-round draft pick and professional basketball player under contract to play in the National Basketball Association (NBA) for the Syracuse Nationals (Nationals) (plaintiff). Barnett signed a standard player contract for the 1959-60 season and then played the 1960-61 season for $8,500 pursuant to an option clause in his contract. In May 1961, Barnett and Nationals President Dan Biasone reached an agreement by telephone whereby Barnett would play for the Nationals during the 1961-62 season for $11,500. Subsequently, Barnett was enticed by a rival team in the American Basketball League (ABL), the Cleveland Pipers (Pipers) (defendant), to enter into a contract to play for $13,000. The Nationals brought suit against the Pipers and Barnett for an injunction to prevent Barnett from playing for the Pipers.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Danaceau, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.